Today at the Bench.....

[Flyeralan]

Yep, 44 Magnum. Ruger has done a pretty good job of maintaining the "classic" look of the lever guns they are introducing. I am going to at least wait until I get a chance to shoot it before I consider mounting a scope. Thanks for your thoughts, it is kind of how I am leaning.

[JeffreyDeGraff]

Yep, 44 Magnum. Ruger has done a pretty good job of maintaining the "classic" look of the lever guns they are introducing. I am going to at least wait until I get a chance to shoot it before I consider mounting a scope. Thanks for your thoughts, it is kind of how I am leaning.

Ive heard/read that Ruger is doing right by these old classics. If ever you need an opinion, look me up, I’m full of them. HAHA!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Flyeralan]

Ive heard/read that Ruger is doing right by these old classics. If ever you need an opinion, look me up, I’m full of them. HAHA!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol! However that is what I asked for.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[JeffreyDeGraff]

Yep, 44 Magnum. Ruger has done a pretty good job of maintaining the "classic" look of the lever guns they are introducing. I am going to at least wait until I get a chance to shoot it before I consider mounting a scope. Thanks for your thoughts, it is kind of how I am leaning.

Here is some pictures of my Marlin 1895 with two different scopes on it. One thing to note on these pictures is that the scopes are mounted about an inch farther back than they should be because of the slip on recoil pad over the factory recoil pad which lengthens the length of pull about an inch.



2-7x32 vortex



1.5-5x20 Leupold.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Flyeralan]

Now that doesn't look bad at all. That is just a sweet looking rifle! I think I like the Vortex look better. The scope I have to put on the 1894 is a Leupold 2-7x32, thinking it might look ok on there now. Thanks for posting these!