I hate to piss on someone’s cornflakes, but I am a scientist. A tree scientist, but I spent much of the last 30 years working with wildlife scientists. A fairly close friend is a wildlife veterinarian. I also have friends involved in condor management in Arizona. The science shows that lead bullets, even when passing through, leave fragments. Some folks culled some deer, x-rayed the entire deer, and saw the lead fragments. Gutted the deer normally. Fragments in gut pile and in carcass. I’ve seen the xrays; my wildlife vet friend said they were real. (Just an aside, these leave no trace, and can be found in processed meat, which we eat. Studies haven’t reached a clear consensus whether deer hunters have higher lead in their blood than non venison eaters, but I know what I would do![emoji3]). The problem is that condors are VERY sensitive to lead poisoning. The research that I am aware of shows that there is sufficient lead in one gut pile to poison a condor. But they don’t often get the whole gut pile. When the birds stop moving for a few days (tracking collar) they capture the bird, clean the lead out of its blood, and put it back on the street. Some birds get “processed” a couple times a year. IN THE FALL after big game hunting seasons start! That is why FISH AND GAME departments are pushing for lead free ammo in condor ranges. These guys are shooters friends, they need shooters. The “bad science” that people point to is that science cannot connect the lead in a brand of bullet to a particular condor. And there is no way to do that. But the preponderance of lead in gut piles and I retrieved animals, the condors feeding habits, and the timing of the illness all strongly suggest that lead bullets are the cause. Also, condors can move several hundred miles in a day. Arizona condors often show up in Wyoming, and could get lead along the way even though parts of Arizona is lead free.
No big deal, we don’t have condors. It is coming. Not from little old laidies in tennis shoes, but from your local game and fish department. Many large birds are also apparently susceptible to lead poisoning. Think bald eagles, which also feed on carcasses. Minnesota loses 40-60 bald eagles each fall after the big game season starts. It was thought that the lead was coming from ducks wounded by hunters still using lead shot, but there are very few violations of the steel shot regulation. Thinking now is that the lead comes from carcasses. Another 2-3 dozen eagles get treated. And these are the ones that are found. How many more are not found? They are researching this now. So are Michigan, Wisconsin, at least one of the Dakotas, Montana, and Utah. That I am aware of.
We have alternatives to lead hunting bullets that perform equal to or better than lead. The cost of using them on a hunting trip is less than a case of beer. Why do we resist doing the right thing and try to minimize collateral damage to other wildlife? People bitched about steel shot for waterfowl, but today we have many affordable alternatives. The NRA pushes the paranoia, but talk with YOUR wildlife biologists, and find out if there is a problem where you hunt. We can either do the right thing and lead the way, or we will be forced by our wildlife manages and/or a judge.
End of rant, it some of those scientists are my friends, I know they are good scientists doing what is right, and I hate to see them bashed by people who are ignorant of the science or have been mislead.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk